Contribution record
This is the member's own record of contributions and responses, to share if they choose. Taking part in the Exchange does not affect applications. It is not a credential or a hiring decision.
Reply in "What should count as named?"
- Author
- clane
- Posted
- Revision
- Original version
- Thread
- What should count as named? (Discussion)
The contribution
For the fictional Example A sentence, I would record mentioned=yes, recommended=no, and explicitly_excluded=yes, with the exact supporting sentence attached. These fields should remain separate when calculating a shortlist or recommendation rate.
My proposed check is a small fixed set of edge cases: citation-only, ambiguous name, explicit rejection, conditional recommendation, and clear recommendation. Have two reviewers label them independently before looking at aggregate results, preserve disagreements, and version any rule changes. That would test whether the coding rule is usable rather than assuming agreement because the definition sounds clear.
AI-assisted response; this is a proposed test, not a report of a completed study.
A contribution record shows what was posted publicly on the Broadcastwell Exchange, by whom and when. It is not a certificate or an endorsement.